CS 661 Written Critiques of Assigned Reading

CS 661: Written Critiques of Assigned Reading

Goals

To give you the ability to extract deep understanding from original research papers. To teach you how to evaluate what you read.

Reading

You should expect to read for two to four hours each week and to write and think for an additional two hours to produce a critique for one of the two assigned papers. Some of these papers have great ideas, but are hard to understand. Some seem obvious in retrospect. Understanding how research progresses shows you how to stand on the shoulders of giants. We will emphasize the historical context in which the work was done to help us understand it.

Format

A critique is due at the beginning of each class. You may choose which of the two assigned papers to critique. No late critiques will be accepted. If you are giving a presentation, you are not responsible for a critique.

You will write one to two pages that reflect on what you learned and thought about the paper. The critique includes a short summary, but most of it will contain your original thoughts about the paper and what you learned.

The following specific format is required.

The document will be in 12 point font, single spaced.
Set the stage. Begin with no more than a quarter page that states the problem the paper addressed, the solution, and the meaning.
State the strength(s) of the paper in one to three sentences.
State the weakness(es) of the paper in one to three sentences.
The remainder of your critique will include two of the following:
- How did it impact the field?
- What questions remain open?
- What experiments are missing?
- How does it really relate the previous research?
- Future directions.
- Some examples for which it will or will not work.
- What impact did it have on the field?
- Could a similar paper be published today?
- Ideas or thoughts it provoked.
- Other interesting commentary.

Sample critique (with thanks to Kathryn McKinley)

Below is an example and more explanation about the structure of a critique and the required format. Please read it. I would prefer that you use the LaTeX template below, but if you do not you are still required to follow the formatting guidelines (12 point font, single spaced).

Grading

I will evaluate critiques on a ten-point scale. There is one bonus point available. Most critiques will receive a ten.

8 points for the required sections: 1 point each for summary, strengths, and weaknesses; 2.5 points for each of the two analysis discussions
1 point for grammar and spelling.
1 point for clarity and grace (i.e., clear, well organized arguments in well organized paragraphs).
1 bonus point for deep analysis and/or surprising me with a really interesting idea.

Late policy

Critiques are due at the beginning of class for the assigned paper. No late critiques will be accepted, except in the case of illness or other reasonable circumstance.

Ethics

As a scientist, you are expected to maintain the highest ethical standards, do your own work, report on it accurately, and acknowledge any assistance.

Feel free to discuss lectures, reading, and assignments with me and other members of the class. You may discuss ideas. You may not copy text, from your peers or other sources. Turning in any work that is not original may be reported to the university and you may even fail the course.

Antony Hosking