Table of Contents

9 September 2011

Roll Call

Minutes of Previous Meeting

Officer Reports

Old Business

New Business

Next Meeting

Adjournment

6 October 2011

Roll Call

Minutes of the Previous Meeting

Speaker

Officer Reports

Old Business

New Business

Next Meeting

Adjournment

ERB Report Notes

  1. Recent Accomplishment in the CS Dept
    1. Finding: Disharmony since 1999 (noted in 1999 and 2005 ERB reports), there is evidence that the dept is performing qulaity work and making notable achievements
  2. Need for a University Wide Vision for Computing and Information Tech
    1. Recommendation: That the Provost lead a pan-Universtiy consideration of how CS and IT will be taught, will advance scholarship and will exploit the leverage to be had in interdisciplinary cooperation across the University.
    2. Committee notes (as did 2005 ERB team) that Purdue addressing this issue is a rare opportunity to have substantial national impact. But that the current administrative structure is unlikely to survive such a planning effort
  3. Dept Leadership and Changing the Climate
    1. Recommendation: The Dean of Science and Provost should declare that consideration of the single issue of realignment of CS into CoE is closed. They should carefully communicate that, while the proposal has some positive attributes, the process for consideration of this singleton realignment issue is no longer functional and is terminated. CS should participate in the pan-University process of repositioning the University to best embrace and exploit CS and IT for education and research.
      1. The dean specifically requested that the ERB not cover this issue, but they must since it is the elephant in the room.
    2. Recommendation: The senior faculty should collectively establish a positive and civil department culture. Disharmony will continue if discussion about realignment continues.
      1. The dept needs to have a stronger strategic vision for the next 5 - 10 years, how to improve national standing (how to recruit the best faculty and grad students), how to leverage educational and research prgms with activities elswhere at University. Primary focus should be faculty hires.
    3. Recommendation: The dept head search should begin immediately.
      1. Most important trait is geuine leadership and management skills. Head candidates should be told that the primary objectives of the dept are to build quality and reputation, to sort out and resolve challenges students face in working across borders between CS and other units, and play a leading role in the determination of the futurte for computing-related research and education across the University.
    4. Recommendation: It is vital that the Dean of Science and the Provost empower the new head not only with the requisite administrative backing to accomplish what must be done, but in addition, with the resources necessary to carry out the ambitious goals for the dept.
      1. “I think this is talking about the Dean and the Provost more than the new head… those two need to support CS and not try to shut us up.” - unattributed quote.
  4. Quality and Perceived Ranking
    1. Recommendation: The dept should select and advance profs for distinctive recognition. The Dean should bend rules if the dept is slow.
  5. Undergraduate Program
    1. Finding: Good job on the undergrads.
    2. The tracks need work (too traditional, need more edge stuff, like ML and CompStat). The divide between CS and ECE does not serve students well.
    3. Recommendation: <Strong> that CS and ECE address the issues that affect student choice and achievements.
    4. Recommendation: Carefully moniter statistics and adjust number of TAs to keep up with growing classes. Encourage all students to take CS and monitor exposure to CS as a key metric for Purdue.
  6. Graduate Program
    1. Finding: PhD numbers are growing, and placement is good.
    2. The department is not benefitting yet from the paying MS, they NEED to do so.
    3. Recommendation: Receive money for MS program and give it to TAs and PhD students.
  7. Diversity
    1. Finding: Little progress made.
    2. Recommendation: Create a climate conducive to promoting diversity.
    3. Stop leaning on women faculty to be the token women. Have a non URM represent URMs, with that as their only position on the committee.
    4. Recommendation: hire more URMs. Use the Provost to hire them faster.
    5. Finding: Purdue lags behind national average. Thus, outreach should increase to women and URMs.
  8. Infrastructure and Staff
    1. Finding: Good.

14 October 2011

Roll Call

Minutes of the Previous Meeting

Officer Reports

Old Business

New Business

Discussion

Next Meeting

Adjournment

11 January 2012

Roll Call

Minutes of the Previous Meeting

Officer Reports

Old Business

New Business

Events

Next GSB Meeting

Adjournment

3 February 2012

Roll Call

Minutes of the Previous Meeting

Old Business

New Business

Next GSB Meeting

Adjournment

24 February 2012

Roll Call

Minutes from the Previous Meeting

Old Business

New Business

Next GSB Meeting

Adjournment